Since Conspiracy Cells of Fire began their attacks and releases explaining his conception of a revolutionary third way (nihilist-individualist, compared to the social and the insurgency) are quite a few debates have been generated around it. While there have been the first, much less, to think and act in this way, they have been the first to articulate a speech, supported by a powerful practice, very consistent and extensive. His reviews have been very accurate and their actions, how could it be otherwise, too. But to what extent we can be useful and practical ideas is a thing to see in the time ahead. For now, otrxs have taken over, and have declared Anarchist group members in prison continue with determination and firmness its action (from refusing to participate in the show trial dismissed his lawyers and insulting lacayxs System vegan at trial to attack the enemies of freedom in prison.)
contribution to the discussion leave a text from Italian insurrectionary anarchist circles to question the dichotomy passivity-armed gang. An article published in the journal Canenero few years ago and published in Castilian in the form of script compilation of various articles of reflection, 'The Disorder of freedom', Outdoor Editions.
administrators have imposed passivity always a false choice: or paralysis or armed group. Anyone who exhaust the normal roles should enter force in emergency. The game has its rules: either to accept or limited power. All this, in addition to power, is very useful for those who have declared they want to build a new revolutionary state. 'No military power is political power' was the motto not many years ago. And military power is not only a hierarchical and authoritarian organization that transforms individuals into soldiers, but is also a representation of a clash between state and armed party that would make us mere spectators, fans ready to make safe mass around one or another contender, the strongest of which, the State, ensuring the victory.
The common ground for this confrontation represented the sacrifice and the slogan, expertise and ideology. And the loss of all pleasure and autonomy, the denial of any exciting project of subversion. Separation is produced between everyday life and the transformation of the existing fragmentation of the whole and the substitution of a suspected heart to conquer and, as a mirror image, which contrasted. Without military power is political power. Exactly. What anarchists? If you want to destroy the political power, what to do with the military? Nothing. O better to do with it as negative consistency between our theory and practice.
These arguments seem tied to a reality of the seventies, now defunct. Historical memory exercises, they usually call. And yet now re-emerging from the hand of the much slapstick as infamous prosecution of Rome. If the object of the judicial assembly [1] was only suppress the anarchists arrested and, more generally, to other researchers, the reasoning would serve the sole purpose of removing the manifestly absurd accusations made by the judges. But not only that. The judges are well aware that there is no anarchist organization speaking. They know that the armed band model , Obtained looking in the mirror can not be applied to the real relations between anarchists. Individuals who come together based on affinity, ie, taking the difference and develop initiatives without formalizing their unions, individuals who are organized, certainly, but never as rigid or vertical, can not be an 'armed group'. And not just because they reject the underground (significant rejection, in any case), but they do not accept-nor framed so Acronyms and programs, in a structure made of a separate reality armed conflict of all subversive. None of this changes if an anarchist, individually and taking their own responsibilities choose to use weapons. But even if all the defendants, or even all the anarchists of the world had, in addition to writing, debate, making love, putting up posters, insult its leaders, labor desertion, occupy spaces, looting goods, used guns, this would not them an 'armed group'. It is the power he needs to invent it. But as we said, the problem can not be reduced to that question, it means understanding the project partially repressive state.
What the judges want to promote is, once again, the idea that outside the expected survival and only the armed organization. Thus, once the show accomplished miserably party fighters, put out of play any talk of insurrection. Anyone who wants insurgency is basically a Leninist masked (in this sense, the police theory of the 'two levels' is a gem [2]), the change is only gradual, on pain of becoming' terrorista'- that is, democratic. The immediate objective of stopping by as much as possible into a dozen anarchists, is passed to the rather more serious-the-finish with all the tension subversive, every attack on the State and Capital. This affects everyone, and any anarchist can feel safe. Fortunately, the insurrection is not what the law enforcement agencies would like whatever.
In a world where the forces of domination and alienation are becoming more supportive of them in the production of goods, the totalitarian control of space, making false advertising needs and the systematic denial of the wishes are inseparable elements of a single process, in this world of terror, the insurgency is increasingly the realization of the whole and the joy of anticipation. There is no center of the work society, and class, hierarchy and duty, which can attack. And that is why the masters of separation we want to lock in a band, to replace the real change their image liar.
A revolutionary project is a collective movement of individual achievement or nothing. O implies, as said Fourier, an immediate exaltation of enjoyment of life, or false. Specialist who stands in the arms is an enemy. The revolutionary party is not an 'armed struggle', because it is much more. Subversive transformation is broader, consciously and exciting and military confrontation is less necessary. Passivity is what creates the armed struggle, and vice versa. State the theorem is therefore reversed. Political and trade union control, beautification reformist daily misery, is born the false need of the armed gang. From theory to practice insurrection born on the other hand the creative action, the poetry of life liquid obedience to the masters, who joined the dispute and gun all the power, the sacrifice and boredom. And the armed desires bring the world upside down.
You see, judges, the game is much more dangerous. Massimo Passamani
[1] This refers to the assembly Marini.
[2] Roman prosecutors accused the anarchists engaged in activities 'public' as publication of books or newspapers, attending meetings, etc, as a cover for their terrorist activities. Came to be called 'theory of the two levels. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment