Blueprints Sno Boards

Countertransference

worked and sent Document Hendel Alicia and Raul Neumann

-S.Freud: "The future prospects of psychoanalytic therapy" (1910).
(...) "We have been led to pay attention to the counter, which is installed in the doctor by the patient exerts influence on his unconscious sense, and we are not far from demanding that discern within himself and dominate. (...) We noticed that every psychoanalyst only goes as far as permitted by their own complexes and internal resistances, and we demand you start your activity with a self-analysis and deepened without interruption as you make your experiences in patients. "
-Laplanche-Pontalis, "December Psychoanalysis "
"Joint analyst's unconscious reactions against the person of the analysand and especially against the transfer of this"
-Heinrich Racker: "Studies on psychoanalytic technique" (1969)
Page 98: "It has also identified some TC resulting from the analyst's identification with the ego and the id of the analysis (concordant identification), and another part resulting from the analyst's identification with the analysand's internal objects (complementary identification). "
Page 99: "The fundamental importance of the introjection of the analyst (by the patient) and good object-free anguish and anger "in the ego and the Syo. (Patient) has been stressed repeatedly. Introjection
But such can only be done if the analyst again and again recognized as CT so dominates and uses for the understanding of the T, overcoming the negative CT and sexual, that, as a spontaneous response to the negative T and sexual, is inevitable; as the analyst actually identify as in part be-transferred in order. "
p. 101: "Panic CT"
"There is analogous to the neuroses T. It is because the identification with the objects transferred (and to a lesser degree to me) the analysis involves the experience of pathological anxiety and defenses of these objects. For example, a wickedly aggressive conduct a review (even before an object extratransferential) causes, I think, normally, the analyst's identification with this object, some degree of persecutory anxiety and reactive aggression. "
p. 104:" The anguish the analyst has experienced, he says, again, what happens in the analysis and what you stand for, the intensity of countertransference anxiety can tell something about the dosage of interpretations concerning this conflict. "
-J.Lacan , Seminar on "Transfer"
In relation to the maneuvers performed with normal CT called Lacan describes as produced by "(...) the rate of oscillation between introjection by the analyst's discourse analysis, and the projection on the analysis of what occurs as a response to imaginary effect that introjection" (pág.220) states that the CT effect is called normal to the extent introjected demand is perfectly understood and what he means is in the plane of i (a) and is supposedly dominated (pág.221). The authors of the theoretical currents that use the CT state that only if the analyst does not understand is affected and then there is a deviation from normal CT and things can get a slip that the analyst really becomes the object projected on it by the patient, situation that can go "retrieving the thread of the situation (...) by recognizing its effects on the analyst and mitigated through communication" (pág.222).
Lacan says:
"(...) Even to the extent there was any legitimacy to this approach, however are our categories which allow us to understand.
In my opinion it is impossible to understand outside the record of what I noted as the place of a, the partial object, the agalma, the relationship of desire, while she herself is determined within a broader relationship, of the requirement love. Only within this topology we can understand such a course of action (which) we can say that even if the subject does not know (..) where a tiny work is already on the other. It follows that what we present on this occasion as normal CT or not, there is really no reason to qualify well in particular. Here is an irreducible fact of the situation of T, simply by itself.
The mere fact that there are T, are involved in the position of being one that contains the agalma, the fundamental object is at stake in the analysis of the subject, as connected, conditioned by the ratio of hesitation of the subject that we characterize as what constitutes the fundamental fantasy as that which establishes the place where the subject can be expressed as the desire.
is a legitimate effect of T. Therefore not necessary to involve the CT, as if it were something that would be the part itself and, even more, the guilty party of the analyst. To recognize only that, the analyst must know certain things. We need to know (...) that the criterion of its correct position is not to understand or do not understand. (...) May be better not to understand too much confidence in their understanding. In other words, you should always question what we understand and say that what is achieved is precisely what at first do not understand. Indeed, only in so far as he knows what is desire, but do not know what you want with this guy, which is embarked on the adventure analytically in a position to take it, the object of that desire.
(p. 222-223).